Student News >> Browse Articles >> College Admissions
EDITORIAL: Getting Rid of the SAT
The Frederick News-Post via Yellowbrix
December 01, 2009
According to a recent Capital News Service story, Salisbury University on Maryland’s Eastern Shore may soon permanently discard the standardized test admission requirement for well-qualified applicants. In recent years, a number of colleges and universities, some of them elite, have been re-examining the role of aptitude tests in their selection process.
Some now believe that grade-point average, class standing and extracurricular activities are better predictors of success in college than scores on standardized tests such as the SAT and ACT.
According to Martha Allman, director of admissions at North Carolina’s Wake Forest University, “The research is becoming pretty undeniable that (a standardized test) isn’t a good prediction of academic success.”
Institutions of higher learning want, of course, to enroll the brightest students they can attract, but a student’s potential for success at college is the focus of the admissions process.
Here is Maryland, McDaniel, Washington and Goucher colleges have already marginalized the importance of standardized test scores. They can be submitted, but are no longer a general requirement for admission.
Many believe that SAT tests are racially, culturally and/or ethnically biased. Doing away with that requirement, they argue, attracts a more diverse pool of applicants.
Institutions such as Salisbury, McDaniel and Washington are no longer requiring test scores from well-qualified students — those with a good class standing and high grade-point average. Others, such as Goucher, have done away with the requirement for all students, though scores are necessary for students seeking merit scholarship consideration.
Salisbury is running a five-year trial of the test-optional policy for high achieving applicants, and Ellen Neufelt, vice president of student affairs at Salisbury, said so far it has not been an issue. According to a assessment by the school’s board of regents, test-submitting and non-test-submitting student had similar GPAs and retention rates over two years.
The debate about the value of standardized test scores isn’t cut and dried, of course. Many continue to believe that these scores provide indisputable indications about the ability and achievement of students, indicators that class rankings and GPAs may not, due to the wide academic disparity among high schools around the nation. Others said that while good test scores may say something about applicants’ knowledge and intelligence, the dedication and hard work required to achieve a high GPA and rank among peers is a more accurate reflection of future success on a college campus.
In the end, making admission tests optional for students may be the most sensible policy for them and the institutions to which they apply. While they may not be the single, best indicator or a student’s potential to succeed, they can provide valuable information. And in the end, of course, colleges may assign whatever degree of importance they choose to the test scores.
To see more of the Frederick News-Post or to subscribe to the newspaper, go to http://www.fredericknewspost.com.
Copyright © 2009, The Frederick News-Post, Md.
Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.
For reprints, email tmsreprints@permissionsgroup.com, call 800-374-7985 or 847-635-6550, send a fax to 847-635-6968, or write to The Permissions Group Inc., 1247 Milwaukee Ave., Suite 303, Glenview, IL 60025, USA.


TrinityB6
27 days ago
i do think that sat and act is here to stay. it will be easier to see how someone compares to other students in their grade and college readiness. every classroom is ran differently and different teachers teach certain things. this just helps to make sure we are alll on the same page to start freshman year. i mean, if someone is really intelligent or smart wouldn't they pass the test with flying colors? or if they are just average, just simply taking advantage of the free online study guides and or borrowing official act or sat books from a friend etc. to practice will help them improve? i think the test is accurate enough to show who is trying and who isnt. if you want the score, you work hard for the score.
MOOK92
about 1 month ago
I have not recieved my SAT score yet and i am on pins and needles. I've worked so hard for the 3.70 that I have and to be in the top 10%. I have been involved in several activities as well. I don't think one test can possibly define a person.
regdoug
3 months ago
I live in NY, where there is a large array of standardized tests and I agree that they aren't everything. However, I believe that the SAT/ACT will always have a role to play because different schools, even neighboring schools can give radically different grades for the same level of achievement. Like it or not, the SAT/ACT will remain a crucial part of most admissions offices for this reason.
NicholeE52
3 months ago
I agree. My ACT score did not reflect my GPA which is a 3.9. I've worked extremely hard for the grades I've been given and I plan on working hard in college also. I think I will do well in college because I work hard. Not because I'm as smart or as dumb as the ACT says I am.
Nivie2010
3 months ago
I agree wholeheartedly. Standardized tests such as the SAT are money making scams that put useless pressue on highschool students. In my experience, I have made an above average score, but I still believe that my potential and abilities far exceed what this test measures. Collegeboard likes to claim that the concepts tested in the SAT are what you have learned in school and this is far from the truth. They like to claim that they are predicting college GPA and that also is far from the truth. It's hard to tell in the admissions process whether that 2350 was a result of coaching, or personal effort. Since this test is coachable, it also puts the lower income students at a significant disadvantage because they cannot afford expensive test-prep that results in perfect or near perfect scores. I know some people that are amazingly intelligent but bad standardized test takers. Should they be put out of the running because they can't take a test that's not based on what they know? I don't think so. As prestigious colleges drift away from this useless requirement,we see that the SAT has no place in the college admissions process. My proposed solution is that colleges should do an extra essay or require an interview in place of the SAT. There is no way we can objectify the admission process because every criteria is subjective.
MaximilianC5
3 months ago
I agree standardized tests are not a good indicator of how well a student will do in school. My daughter's ACT 19 & she graduated Magna Cum Laude. In additon, my ACT 17 and I have a Masters degree.