Student News >> Browse Articles >> Financial Aid

+1

EDITORIAL: Ending Private Student Loans a Good Thing

EDITORIAL: Ending Private Student Loans a Good Thing

The Salt Lake Tribune via Yellowbrix

September 22, 2009

Sep. 22—For private lenders, student loans are a sweetheart deal, a federal subsidy of sorts. They assume no risk, and a tidy profit is guaranteed.

The federal government not only gives them a cut for making and administering student loans, but taxpayers back the loans if a borrower defaults.

There’s got to be a better way to help students and their families cover the rapidly rising cost of college tuition, and it appears Congress has found it: The Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2009.

The measure, approved handily by House Democrats last week by a vote of 253-171, would wisely remove the middleman, and use the substantial savings derived from direct federal lending to strengthen education as a whole.

But the bill is expected to encounter resistance in the Senate, where lobbyists for private lenders are lining up to save a cash cow. While it’s true, as the financial sector and their Republican puppets say, that the switch would result in job losses, much more would be gained.

The savings would be significant — at least $47 billion over the next 10 years, according to the Congressional Budget Office. While as much as $10 billion could be returned to the treasury, the remaining money would be reinvested in education.

Much of the savings would be redirected to the Pell Grant program, one of the primary means for low-income college students to pay for their education without amassing a lifetime of debt. The annual

stipends would increase from the current maximum of $5,350 to as much as $5,550 in 2010 and $6,900 by 2019.

Another $10 billion in savings would be earmarked for construction projects and workforce training programs at two-year community colleges, the backbone of the higher education system with 6 million students.

The bill also provides $2.55 billion to help improve colleges and universities that have historically served black students, and another $8 billion for early-childhood education programs.

“Today, the House made a clear choice to stop funneling vital taxpayer dollars through [bank] boardrooms and start sending them directly to dorm rooms,” said Sen. George Miller, D-Calif., the chairman of the House Education and Labor Committee.

Now, the Senate must choose. Continue to bolster the bottom line of banks, or make a timely investment in our future by helping more young adults get the education necessary to guarantee their own.


To see more of The Salt Lake Tribune, or to subscribe to the newspaper, go to http://www.sltrib.com.

Copyright © 2009, The Salt Lake Tribune

Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

For reprints, email tmsreprints@permissionsgroup.com, call 800-374-7985 or 847-635-6550, send a fax to 847-635-6968, or write to The Permissions Group Inc., 1247 Milwaukee Ave., Suite 303, Glenview, IL 60025, USA.


+1
  • Photo_user_blank_big

    WilliamB1738

    about 1 month ago

    Banks have been cutting interest rates for years while cranking up interest rates on ANY loan to about as high as they can get away with.

    Now, I tried school years ago, and had a NDSL (renamed to the Stafford Loan,) The next, I got a GSL offered (Guaranteed Student Loan)... heh... ANY bank I took the papers to about it treated it no different than a personal loan for education (as if the loan wasn't already guaranteed.) I, for one, am glad to see such a PAIN to everyone (but the banks) done away with.

  • Simpsoncathy_max50

    catthbr

    about 1 month ago

    To all of those who are still working, be grateful that you have your job still. Find out if these additional funds extend to online college degree program, take the classes, get your degree, keep your job as long as you can and keep your lights on, your rent/mortgage paid & food in your stomach.
    For those of us who have been "restructured" out of our jobs, the $385 weekly payment is barely keeping many of us above water. So those who fit in the "restructured" category who have been pounding the pavement, looking for a job - that's not there....go back to college. Take advantage of the money that is being given. Since many of us have to take out loans for some portion of it anyway (since financial aid is based on the PREVIOUS YEAR'S Salary) we wouldn't qualify for any real big $$ until the 2nd year of learning.
    Don't be so hard on one another...if the situation is right for you, go for it. Now is the time...and like I said that $385 doesn't really cover normal expenses AND books, carfare, lunch, etc...so if there is a way for more students, adults can improve their lives by getting a better education...let us all be better educated then!

  • Simpsoncathy_max50

    catthbr

    about 1 month ago

    To all of those who are still working, be grateful that you have your job still. Find out if these additional funds extend to online college degree program, take the classes, get your degree, keep your job as long as you can and keep your lights on, your rent/mortgage paid & food in your stomach.
    For those of us who have been "restructured" out of our jobs, the $385 weekly payment is barely keeping many of us above water. So those who fit in the "restructured" category who have been pounding the pavement, looking for a job - that's not there....go back to college. Take advantage of the money that is being given. Since many of us have to take out loans for some portion of it anyway (since financial aid is based on the PREVIOUS YEAR'S Salary) we wouldn't qualify for any real big $$ until the 2nd year of learning.
    Don't be so hard on one another...if the situation is right for you, go for it. Now is the time...and like I said that $385 doesn't really cover normal expenses AND books, carfare, lunch, etc...so if there is a way for more students, adults can improve their lives by getting a better education...let us all be better educated then!

  • Photo_user_blank_big

    NullN29123

    about 1 month ago

    ashamil... you are a sanctimonious idiot. How dare you stand on your high and mighty pulpit and lecture csoenen for trying to obtain an education. I guess you think the federal government should just run everything for us. Do you want them to wipe nose too?

  • Photo_user_blank_big

    ashamil

    about 1 month ago

    csoenen, that is ridiculous of you to say.
    There are all kids of special grants and scholarships for parents returning to college.
    This is a good change, just because you refuse to do the foot work of finding money for your education, which you admittedly should have done years ago if you have kids to support, doesn't mean that banks do better with student and taxpayer money in interest fees than students themselves do with higher allotments.
    Really, I would say this has limited effect on you, if any, unless you actually qualify for the grants or loans, which you might.
    Pay attention before you whine about the crummy predicament(s) you put yourself in and have yet to make much if any real effort to pull yourself out of.
    Good job.

  • Photo_user_blank_big

    csoenen

    about 1 month ago

    What about those of adults who realize going back to school. Those of us who don't qualify for federal aid as well because we still have work full time, and because of that we make too much money for aid. Without some kind of aid or loan many of us simply can not afford school let alone try to put food on the table, pay the electric bill, the house payment/rent, and still be productive both at work and at school. This is not a good change!!!

  • Photo_user_blank_big

    IanK66

    about 1 month ago

    There are means by which an individual can quantify themselves as an independent and be under the age of 24. Call the financial aid office of the institution you are planning to attend. Start there.

  • Photo_user_blank_big

    DavidL1930

    about 1 month ago

    And what about students who don't qualify for federal aid, but who's parents have chosen not to pay for their child's tuition, -for whatever reason? Does this leave the independent student, who the government still declares as "dependent" because they're under 24 or not married, with no means to obtain student loans to foot the cost of their education?