Follow us for scholarships:
Print

Financial Aid >> Browse Articles >> Expert Financial Aid Advice

Financial Aid >> Browse Articles >> FAFSA

Financial Aid >> Browse Articles >> Grants

Financial Aid >> Browse Articles >> Loans

-641

President Obama Proposes Cuts in Aid Programs to Preserve Pell Grant

Mark Kantrowitz / Publisher of FinAid and FastWeb

February 14, 2011

President Obama is proposing to cut some student aid programs to maintain the maximum Pell Grant at $5,550 in 2011-12 as part of the FY2012 federal budget request. This comes after the House Republican leadership proposed cutting the maximum Pell Grant by $845 on Friday.

The Pell Grant program has a $20 billion funding shortfall due to large increases in the number of recipients and the average grant amount. The number of Pell Grant recipients increased 45% from 6.1 million in FY2008 to 8.9 million in FY2010. At the same time, the average Pell Grant increased 39% from $2,970 to $4,115. Combined, the total expenditures for the Pell Grant program doubled in just three years.

The program’s recent growth is partly because of the economy and partly because the maximum grant was increased to compensate for four years of flat funding during the Bush administration. The number of students filing the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) is up by about a third in the last three years. More of the applicants are qualifying for the Pell Grant. The Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 was supposed to provide stable funding for the Pell Grant program, but $20 billion in savings from the switch to 100% Direct Lending was diverted to deficit reduction.

If the funding shortfall is not addressed, the maximum Pell Grant will drop from $5,550 to $3,240 in 2011-12, a decrease of $2,310. To avoid this, the President is proposing to cut other student aid funding, such as year-round Pell Grants and the subsidized interest on student loans to graduate and professional students.

Eliminating year-round Pell Grants. The year-round Pell Grant program allows students in accelerated programs to receive two Pell Grants in a single year. It was enacted by the Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008 and became available in the 2009-10 academic year. The US Department of Education says that the extra grants “cost 10 times more than anticipated and failed to demonstrate a meaningful impact on students’ academic progress.” The year-round Pell Grants were also disproportionately used by for-profit colleges, which are more likely to have students studying year-round without a summer break. Eliminating the year-round Pell Grants saves about $8 billion.

Eliminating the subsidized interest benefit on subsidized Stafford loans for graduate and professional students. During the in-school and grace periods the federal government pays the interest on subsidized Stafford loans. The budget proposal will eliminate this benefit on subsidized Stafford loans to graduate and professional students, but retain it for undergraduate students. (The budget proposal also appears to allow undergraduate subsidized Stafford loans to continue to qualify for the subsidized interest benefit during in-school deferments for graduate and professional school.) In effect the subsidized Stafford loans will become unsubsidized Stafford loans. The US Department of Education says that the subsidized interest benefit for graduate students is “poorly targeted” at financial need. Eliminating the subsidized interest benefit will increase the graduate student debt burden, but the income-based repayment plan and public service loan forgiveness program provide a safety net for students who struggle to repay their debt. This change will save about $2 billion.

The elimination of subsidized interest on loans to graduate and professional students will increase the debt at repayment by about a fifth, adding thousands of dollars to their debt burden. Currently, graduate and professional students can borrow up to $8,500 a year in subsidized Stafford loans. (The average subsidized Stafford loan for graduate and professional students was $7,083 in 2007-08. About a third (35.5%) of graduate and professional students received subsidized Stafford loans, a total of 1,227,400 students. Almost half (47.0% or 519,600 students) of graduating graduate and professional students graduate with subsidized Stafford loans, $16,899 on average.) The interest rate on subsidized Stafford loans for graduate and professional students is 6.8%. The average life of a subsidized Stafford loan dollar in an in-school or grace period is 2.9 years for graduate and professional student borrowers. This means that losing the subsidized interest benefit will add $1,676 to each $8,500 loan balance by the time the student enters repayment, a 19.7% increase. This adds more than $3,333 to the debt burden of graduate and professional students who graduate with a typical amount of subsidized Stafford loans. This assumes that the borrower defers repaying the interest by capitalizing it and that the interest is capitalized once, at repayment.

Adding an incentive for “split borrowers” to move their loans to the Direct Loan program. More than 6 million borrowers currently have loans in both the federally-guaranteed student loan program and the direct loan program. The US Department of Education will offer these borrowers an incentive of up to 2% of their loan balance to move their loans into the Direct Loan program. This program will save about $2 billion.


-641
  • Max50_attachment-3

    CatherineB458

    26 days ago

    JeniseA4, I know how you, I was told just a month ago I was max out on student loads and Pell because of President bad decisions. I had four classes to go before I graduated now I can't afford my education. I was in tears because I just found I made the honor society and can not finish my education. Something has to be done soon, we need a new president who knows what he doing not one who is blaming everyone else for for his screw ups.

  • Max50_photo_user_blank

    zflores8

    3 months ago

    If I have future plans, and the president changes everything and I can't complete my plans for his bad decision ... of cut, But for Iraq and Pakistan Have Money But not for the students. wow, what kind of president is this ....

  • Max50_photo_user_blank

    JohnmichaelS10

    5 months ago

    This stinks..

  • Max50_photo_user_blank

    DavidGaray

    5 months ago

    Ill takke what ever they offer something is better than nothing.

  • Max50_photo_user_blank

    webbk

    7 months ago

    Government grants just undercut themselves anyway, so why does it matter? They're supposed to be an investment, but they're not really profitable, so it doesn't matter. Plus they're spending money they don't have, which makes no sense.

  • Max50_photo_user_blank

    LagustaSmith87

    7 months ago

    this is some real shit

  • Max50_photo_user_blank

    giovanniflores1

    8 months ago

    People are not thumbing down this article, it is about what is going on am I right?

  • Max50_photo_user_blank

    Jaiseeta

    9 months ago

    I need an edication and I want to attend Academty of Arts.....I am sad because aia will not beable to pay this...and I can't make student loans because I know I will not afford to py it back!!! It's fustrating!! I spent many hours in the days trying to find grants to pay for my art school and I cannot understand the issues and red tape u ave to go through...noone wants to help me...it is just me bymyself trying REALLY hard to pay m whole classes,etc...I'm a por girl bit I do ave a High Scool Diploma...Art is m passion, eversince I was little...I don' know if I'll ever reach my oals...u know...it's heart breaking because I need help and assistance to lead me right...I'm afraid that my dream will not previle because of my poor money...I aint got none!! :'(

  • Max50_photo_user_blank

    Stephstyle21

    10 months ago

    There are different issues going on with the changes in Financial Aid. I can understand the government needing to lower the price of the Pell Grant and I am fine with that. I would rather get some help than none at all. But this is what is upsetting me about the issues at hand. I paid for my college the first time I went back in 2004, I paid cash for classes, books, fees, etc.. and never did I apply for financial aid. I have choosen to go back to school to change my career 6 years later. I applied for financial aid and was approved, I am a single mother of three children who recieves no other benifits from the government or child support for that matter(I also work full time.) I attended college for 3 semesters, did what everyone else is required to do as far as re-applying for my Financial Aid, and was shocked when I was denied, even my appeal was denied.
    After doing research I have gone under what they call the 150% rule, which means I have completed to many college credits to qualify for Financial Aid. For this program I have only completed an A.S. degree (which is not even 40% done,) so after research I found out that the government is actually deniying my financial aid because I completed a VOCATIONAL program that I paid for 6 years ago. All of the counsolers I talk to can not answer or justify this issue, is there anyone who can? Or is there anyone else going through the same thing?

  • Max50_photo_user_blank

    sbakenra11

    10 months ago

    HELLO! President Obama is trying to preserve the Pell Grant!! Not take it away! If you read the story just below this, it says that the republicans want to take it down by 800 some dollars, and he is trying to keep it! Why does everyone keep blaming our president for everything that goes wrong?! Haven't we all taken government class and understand that he cannot just make a decision without it having to pass congress?? He is not a dictator, there are laws for what he can do too!! If you want to blame someone, blame congress!

  • Max50_photo_user_blank

    JohnB1327

    10 months ago

    This is like Robin Hood, only it's "stealing from the poor to give to the poorer"...

    As if almost any graduate student actually has any money at all, nonetheless money to pay high interest on a loan while they're still in school...

    As a (soon-to-be former) ardent Obama supporter, I say (if the headline here is actually correct), "thanks a lot!". If the debt ceiling legislation passes with this in it, I WILL NOT be casting a vote for the Democrats in 2012. This is a backdoor TAX INCREASE and perhaps what I really need is another party who can better look after my economic interests...

  • Max50_photo_user_blank

    Allen_JT

    10 months ago

    I agree with johnston1028, we could learn a great deal from the European Countries to fix our education system. However, one fix in one area will not solve all problems across the board. It is a multi-layered issue that requires equal effort and sacrifice from all groups of people.

    If you want a reference for increased quality of life at lower paychecks, take a look at New Zealand. Quality of life does not have to be sacrificed, the key part that has been done is equal share of the burden. European Countries have done this with Education and New Zealand has done it with their tax systems.

    Look at each country other than your own, then help your representatives in Washington D.C. by compiling these approaches in single letter (or short-and-to-the-point packets) for them. We all don't like large amounts of work at the last minute, but each of us loves individually-relative smaller "bites" of the work load that we can complete in one part of a day.

    This is a brilliant part of each person in the American Nation, we work to make life easier in the long-run. We are not stupid, each of us no matter our situation has the kahones to think through any situation to survive another day.

    We also learn to be great at humility, even if it comes at the worst individually-relative moments in our life. I am quite sure we could ask other countries to assist us in making a financial plan that works. We learn from our interactions throughout life, a lovely bit of ingenuity from nature.

    I will compile such a letter to my representative in Washington and have it sent at the fastest rate I can reasonably afford at this point in history. It will not be perfect or entirely fool-proof, but it will be well thought out as much as I can make it.

    Utopian would be wonderful, but this practical approach is more than enough for now.

  • Max50_photo_user_blank

    redelf99

    10 months ago

    Realistically we are only taking a few hundred per person. Sometimes you have to tighten the belt and skip the $5 late'. I love the little things too, but the whole reason I went back to college after 8 years was because I was working the same job and only making 65% of the pay I was 4 years ago. If our country is going to recover from this situation we all have to work harder for less pay for a while. Pell Grants included.

  • Max50_photo_user_blank

    cassie94122

    12 months ago

    What! He should not be doing this! I'm pretty sure he didnt pay for college on his own!!!!!

  • Max50_photo_user_blank

    sartajswarup

    12 months ago

    We appreciate that taking loan is more important than taking pell grant for our students. Notice, some of them may not be satisfied what the pell grant dropped from $5,550 to $3,240 who don't seek student loan in this year. It's our negative attitude except loan seekers! Both of us need same better aid to beg our Mr. President Obama. I'm gone pity...